From hacking a school account to a sexting charge, Texas prosecutes minors for online conduct under real criminal statutes. Former Judge Jerry Michael Acosta defends juveniles in cyber crime cases across greater Houston.

Juvenile Cyber Crimes Defense in Texas

Teenagers live online, and increasingly, so do their criminal cases. Conduct that a young person experiences as a prank, a dare, or an ordinary part of growing up, guessing a classmate's password, making a fake account, forwarding a photo, can be charged under Texas criminal statutes that were written with far more serious conduct in mind. Parents are often the last to know, because by the time a school or detective calls, investigators may already have months of messages, posts, and login records in hand.

If your child is being investigated or has been charged with an offense involving a computer, a phone, or a social media account, take it seriously immediately. Digital cases move differently than other juvenile cases. The evidence is voluminous, it is easy to misread, and it rarely tells the whole story on its own. The right defense starts with someone who understands both the technology and the juvenile courts.

Attorney Jerry Acosta has practiced Texas juvenile law for more than 20 years and has served as a judge, giving him a rare view of how courts actually evaluate these cases. He has been named a Super Lawyer for 10 consecutive years, a distinction earned by fewer than five percent of Texas attorneys.

​

Common Cyber Crime Charges Filed Against Juveniles

Texas has built out a substantial body of law aimed at online conduct, and juveniles are charged under the same statutes as adults. The charges we see most often include:

• Breach of Computer Security: accessing a computer, network, or account without the owner's consent, from guessing a teacher's password to logging into another student's social media. Penalties escalate sharply when harm or fraud is alleged

• Online Impersonation: creating a fake profile or page in someone else's name with intent to harm, defraud, intimidate, or threaten. The profile version of this offense is a third-degree felony

• Sexting and Related Offenses: minors who share or possess intimate images of other minors can be charged under a statute written specifically for teen sexting, or in serious cases under the state's child pornography laws

• Cyberbullying and Online Harassment: repeated electronic communications meant to harass, torment, or embarrass, addressed by the harassment statute as expanded under David's Law

• Online Solicitation of a Minor: sexually explicit communication between a minor and another minor or adult online, which we cover in depth on our juvenile sex crimes pages

​
The pattern across all of these charges is the same: statutes with adult-sized penalties being applied to adolescent behavior. That is not a reason to panic, but it is a reason to get experienced counsel involved before your child talks to anyone.

​

Why Digital Cases Are Different

In a typical juvenile case, the evidence is a police report and a few witness statements. In a cyber case, the State may have thousands of messages, screenshots supplied by other teenagers, subpoenaed platform records, and forensic images of seized devices. That volume cuts both ways 

• Context gets lost. A message pulled out of a months-long group chat can look sinister when the surrounding conversation would explain it

• Attribution is assumed, not proven. A shared password, a borrowed phone, or a sibling's account can put your child's name on someone else's conduct

• Screenshots can be edited, cropped, or fabricated entirely, and teenagers supplying evidence to school officials are not neutral witnesses

• Devices are often seized and searched in ways that raise real Fourth Amendment questions

​​

We treat the State's digital evidence as a starting point for investigation, not a finished fact. Where the case warrants it, we work with digital forensics experts to examine metadata, account access records, and device histories that can tell a very different story.

​

School Discipline and Criminal Charges at the Same Time

Most juvenile cyber cases begin at school. A student reports something, an administrator investigates, and a school resource officer gets involved. Your child can then face two proceedings at once: school discipline, including suspension or placement in an alternative program, and a criminal referral. What your child says in the principal's office can surface in the courtroom. We counsel families on both tracks, because protecting your child's education and protecting their legal position have to happen together.

​

Consequences and the Path Back

Depending on the charge, a juvenile adjudicated for a cyber offense may face probation with device and internet restrictions, counseling requirements, placement, or commitment to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department in the most serious cases. Some online offenses involving explicit material carry the additional risk of sex offender registration, which makes early, aggressive defense essential.

The path back matters just as much. Juvenile records can often be sealed once the case is resolved and eligibility requirements are met, and we build every defense with that endpoint in mind. A mistake your child made online at 14 should not answer for them at 24.

​

Talk to a Juvenile Defense Attorney Who Knows These Cases

Jerry Michael Acosta & Associates, PLLC represents young people and their families in cyber crime cases throughout Harris County, Fort Bend County, Montgomery County, Galveston County, Chambers County, and Brazoria County. If a school, detective, or investigator has contacted you about your child's online activity, call us before anyone gives a statement. Contact Jerry Acosta Law today. The consultation is confidential, and the earlier we start, the more options your child has.

​​​